🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a prohibition on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Appeals Court Concurs to Reconsider Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an expanded group of 11 judges. The judicial body also overturned a earlier decision from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Military Presence

This order represents the most recent development in a protracted legal battle over whether the administration has the authority and valid reason to send state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since the end of September when the deployment effort was initiated in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while local authorities maintain that local officers have control of the situation.

In defiance of descriptions of the city as a conflict zone, residents have been sharing footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and planning events such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in Portland enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one blocking the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the deployment of any military personnel in Oregon, after attempts to evade the initial injunction by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling stayed effective, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under review together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the military into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending state legislation, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding moves forward and our fight continues in the judicial system.”